Share this:
The publication of the Government's Rewiring the State – Cabinet Statement has prompted considerable discussion across local government. While devolution has been a feature of public policy for many years, the statement signals a further shift towards transferring powers, funding and responsibility away from Whitehall and towards strategic and local government institutions. More recently, that debate has acquired added significance following the Government's decision to pause elements of the local government reorganisation programme. Although the breaking news right now is that it will go ahead in 5 counties!
While the reasons for the original pause and the choice to hold off still for some areas remains the subject of discussion, some commentators have suggested that the Government's focus may now be on the wider programme of reform set out in Rewiring the State with its emphasis on devolution, strategic authorities and place-based governance. Whether local government reorganisation ultimately resumes on the same trajectory, or evolves alongside this broader reform agenda, remains an open question.
The direction of travel for now is this. The Government wants strategic authorities to play a larger role in economic development, transport, housing, skills and aspects of public service delivery. It also proposes greater fiscal devolution and a reconfiguration of how central government interacts with local places.
None of that is uncontroversial.
Supporters will point to the longstanding criticism that England remains one of the most centralised countries in Europe and argue that decisions are often better made closer to the communities affected by them. The Local Government Association has broadly welcomed the proposals and sees them as a significant step in the continuing devolution journey.
Equally, there are important questions which remain unanswered.
The practical consequences of moving powers between institutions are often more complex than the original policy announcement suggests. Accountability can become harder for residents to navigate. Responsibilities may overlap. New governance arrangements inevitably create uncertainty about where decisions sit and who should be held responsible when outcomes fall short.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, much of the commentary from the sector has focused less on the vision and more on the detail still to come.
The LGIU, while welcoming the broad ambition, has emphasised the need to define clearly the respective roles of councils and strategic authorities. Its analysis highlights the importance of ensuring that councils do not become peripheral within a more devolved system and argues that successful reform will depend on the relationship between local authorities and emerging strategic institutions rather than simply the transfer of powers from one tier to another.
For local government lawyers, those issues are particularly significant.
Constitutions, delegations, scrutiny arrangements, ethical governance, financial accountability and public law compliance are rarely the most eye-catching aspects of reform. Yet experience consistently shows that they determine whether reform succeeds in practice. Strong institutions require more than new powers. They require clarity about how those powers are exercised and by whom.
There is also a wider constitutional point. Devolution changes the distribution of authority within the state. Whenever that occurs, careful consideration must be given to democratic accountability, transparency and public confidence. Those questions become even more important where responsibilities are shared across multiple organisations.
Rewiring the State is therefore best viewed not as a destination but as the beginning of a debate. The ambitions are substantial. Whether they deliver meaningful change will depend less on the headline announcements and more on the detailed governance framework that follows. For the legal profession in local government, that is where much of the real work lies.
These questions will not be resolved by legislation alone. They will require careful consideration by those responsible for governance, democratic accountability and the practical operation of public institutions. As the detail behind Rewiring the State begins to emerge, the local government sector will need to grapple with a series of interconnected challenges, from constitutional design and devolution governance to ethical leadership and organisational resilience.
These themes will be central to discussions at the LLG Governance Conference on 20th November in London. The conference provides a timely opportunity for governance professionals, monitoring officers and local government lawyers to examine the implications of devolution and local government reorganisation, alongside the equally pressing issues of artificial intelligence, standards, ethics and public accountability. At a time of significant institutional change, there is perhaps no more important conversation than how local government can remain effective, lawful and trusted while adapting to new structures and new challenges.
Share this:
Latest News
